Human Overpopulation: Expose the Pink Elephant

Human Overpopulation: Expose the Pink Elephant // Jun 29, 2018

A cyclone wreaks death and destruction on delta, with death toll estimates of 15,000, then 2,000,000, settling on 500,000. We will never know for sure, since most bodies were washed out to sea.

We will blame the cyclone, ocean temperatures, jet streams, Arctic temperature amplification, or people for living in harms way.  But we never blame overpopulation. We rarely acknowledge exponential population growth stressing resources and crowding people into tiny regions prone to catastrophe. We must come to grips with overpopulation [1].
———- ———-

[1] Link to World Meters, World Population, here.
———- ———-

Please consider donating to support my work.  I put a lot of time and effort into researching, studying and producing my videos so that you can learn how quickly our world is changing.

Donating does not need a PayPal account, but simply a credit card. Please click here.

Advertisements

About paulbeckwith

Well known climate science educator; Part-time Geography professor (climatology, oceanography, environmental issues), University of Ottawa. Physicist. Engineer. Master's Degree in Science in Laser Optics, Bachelors of Engineering, in Engineering Physics. Won Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario gold medal. Also interested in investment and start-ups in climate solutions, renewable energy and energy efficiency. Avid chess player, and likes restoring old homes. Married with children.
This entry was posted in Catastrophe, Climate, Climate Change, Global Warming, New Video, Rapid Climate Change, Science, Uncategorized, Videos, Warnings, Weather and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Human Overpopulation: Expose the Pink Elephant

  1. One person is, of course, less of a burden on ecosystems that 7.6 billion. But then Paul Ehrlich wrote in his writings that half of the above total was far to much for the planet. Although he was arguably incorrect, or inaccurate, what he did not write about was an alternative with which the Earth could absorb our kind and still be relatively healthy.

    Very few mention overpopulation since it is an arbitrary number that is mostly proposed by those who have sets of parameters on which they base their numbers. In essence, there are many species which outnumber us in mass and in energy consumption, and do not threaten the earth’s environments. What is needed is to analyse species that do outnumber us and to ask ourselves why it is that these species can live in relative harmony with nature while we cannot.

    The answers are simple, and available. So why aren’t we looking for them, at them…. ? People who think there are too many of us seldom personally volunteer to reduce our numbers, and so viable solutions need to be found to remedy the ongoing dilemma, which is not a dilemma at all.

    Like

  2. Dale Lanan says:

    Looking danger in the eye
    There are not enough 2C
    Though evidence is Real,
    The Work needed to Fix
    the harm done biosphere
    Needs all hands on deck
    Working with dire desire
    To Be kind to Time Tiger
    To let the Sparrows Sing

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s