Were The California Wildfires Deliberately Set?

      

Left image BEFORE: Particulates (PM10) in air at 2000 Local Time.
Right image AFTER: Particulates (PM10) in air at 2100 Local time. Note that the particulates have all appeared in multiple locations within the space of 1 hour. This seems suspicious to me, assuming that the data is correct [1].

Were The California Wildfires Deliberately Set? // Published on Oct 10, 2017

About a week before the California wildfires erupted, I wrote a post titled:  ‘Climate Change Magnified MegaFires‘ with a video  called Amplification of MegaFires from Climate Change‘.

In this video I discuss horrendous and ongoing California fires.  These wildfires have killed multiple people (100s are still missing) and destroyed thousands of buildings. In examining Earth Nullschool data on air particulates, it seems that the fires appeared in multiple locations within the space of one hour.  This seems suspicious, if the data is accurate.
——————-

People walk past fallen transformer along Parker Hill Road in Santa Rosa, Calif. on Tuesday, Oct. 10, 2017. (Nhat V. Meyer/Bay Area News Group)

A few hours after the uploading of my video to YouTube and this blog post, this link ‘PG&E power lines linked to wine country fires’ (article in full, at link, a selection), to a possible fire cause was posted to my Facebook pages. Perhaps power lines were knocked over in multiple places igniting the fires?

As the first reports came in Sunday night of numerous fires that would grow into one of the most destructive wildfire disasters in California history, emergency dispatchers in Sonoma County received multiple calls of power lines falling down and electrical transformers exploding.

‘In all, according to a review of emergency radio traffic by the Bay Area News Group, Sonoma County dispatchers sent out fire crews to at least 10 different locations across the county over a 90-minute period starting at 9:22 pm to respond to 911 calls and other reports of sparking wires and problems with the county’s electrical system amid high winds‘.
——————-

[1].  Please note: Earth Nullschool has the fire starting between 2017-10-09 20:00 and 2017-10-09 21:00. Published reports say the fire started Sunday night which would be 2017-10-08, so I think the Nullschool date is wrong (and is a day behind)?
——————-

Please consider donating to support my work.  I put a lot of time and effort into researching, studying and producing my videos so that you can learn how quickly our world is changing.

Donating does not need a PayPal account, but simply a credit card. Please click here.

About paulbeckwith

Well known climate science educator; Part-time Geography professor (climatology, oceanography, environmental issues), University of Ottawa. Physicist. Engineer. Master's Degree in Science in Laser Optics, Bachelors of Engineering, in Engineering Physics. Won Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario gold medal. Also interested in investment and start-ups in climate solutions, renewable energy and energy efficiency. Avid chess player, and likes restoring old homes. Married with children.
This entry was posted in a Global Warming, a New Video, a Rapid Climate Change, a Weather, Basic Science, Catastrophe, Collapse, News, Recently Published, Uncategorized, Warnings and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Were The California Wildfires Deliberately Set?

  1. Val Eisman says:

    Don’t know. There is scant info on this subject.

    Like

  2. Val Eisman says:

    http://ww

    w.mercurynews.com/2017/10/10/pge-power-lines-linked-to-wine-country-fires/

    Like

  3. Guy Lane says:

    Hi Paul. Here is a climate science question that I am sure you know the answer to. I am confused at the idea of CO2 absorbing infra-red, which I understand to be the same as ‘absorbing heat’. If oxygen and nitrogen doesn’t absorb infrared (a non-GHG), does it somehow absorb energy from that re-radiated from the CO2. Otherwise, it suggests that the oxygen and nitrogen doesn’t get warm… even though it comprises 99% of the atmosphere. A ham-fisted question, I know, but I think you get the idea… The question prompted by this webpage:

    https://scied.ucar.edu/carbon-dioxide-absorbs-and-re-emits-infrared-radiation

    Like

  4. jj says:

    Probably done by the shadow government/black ops/military

    Like

Leave a comment