Extinction Radio was great to start. And it was great when Gene Gibson, Ivy Cone, and Peter Melton stepped in. And to the delight of us all, the show has been back up for several months, with show original founder Mike Ferrigan doing a fantastically good job, back at the helm visioning, leading, and employing. Doubly so, with most esteemed colleague and climate generalist Jennifer Hynes taking an active and progressively growing role on the show now (dk).
It is with great honor, that Paul is featured at the beginning of Part Two, ‘Paul Beckwith- The Donald and more!‘, following no less than Gail Tverberg at Part One, who writes cogently and eloquently on peak oil at Our Infinite World–also at wordpress. And consistently (dk).
Paul’s slot is easy is to find as it starts at 0:00 and goes to 34:43: ‘Extinction Radio Episode 61, 14th Dec 2016, Episode, Gail Tverberg, Paul Beckwith‘.
And Paul has been a regular guest, but not for the last month. This is a great follow up to his recent comprehensive interview with Alex Smith: ‘Cracks in the Big Picture, Radio Ecoshock Podcasts‘ from November 30th, 2016.
——— ———-
As Paul says: “Please consider making a donation. Every bit helps, as my work is not funded by research grants or University stipends, but is fully independent. Every bit helps. Thank you.”
Easy to use PayPal feature, here. 
His YouTube channel has recently exceeded 1M total views and your support helps in furthering his message and getting the word out regarding our urgent predicament and potential solutions.
Paul Beckwith, Climate System Scientist 
It’s delusional to think that Clinton would have done anything about climate change. If that were so, how do you explain the non-policies of the last eight years?
If I’d had a vote in the US election, I would have voted for Trump. The reason? Because Hillary is a warmonger with a long record of suppporting bloodshed. All those nations destroyed in the Balkans, the Middle East and North Africa, and Hillary wants more blood. She wanted a no-fly zone in Syria, which would have meant shooting down Russian planes, which would have resulted in World War 3.
I have listened to your excellent work and read your articles over the years, but you’re way off the mark on this, Paul. Nuclear winter is not a good way to resolve global warming.
LikeLike