Paul’s Response to Washington Post, Jetstream Article

To: Jason Samenow; Washington Post
Date: Wednesday July 20, 2016
Regarding:  The June 30th Washington Post article titled “Claim that jet stream crossing equator is ‘climate emergency’ is utter nonsense

Dear Jason,

Since both my YouTube video: (“Unprecedented? Jet Stream Crosses Equator.”) and your subsequent article on my video (and on Robert Scribbler’s blog) regarding the jet streams crossing the equator went viral, I feel that it is very important that I am given the opportunity in the Washington Post to correct the record on both my work and my statements.

I feel that your article has misrepresented and compromised both my reputation and my credibility, and I wish to defend both by having this document published in the Washington Post.

What I actually said in the video is very different from what was reported in the article. In addition, I feel that I was not given a reasonable chance to comment prior to the article being initially published online. I received an email from you on June 30th at 12:39 pm asking me if I wished to comment on your article in preparation,  and I replied at 1:48 pm, saying that I would like to comment via phone. I then noticed that the article had already been published online, and although you subsequently emailed me later that day, I felt that the damage had already been done; it was already after the fact. I am not sure what to suggest to avoid such problems in the future, since I know that there are often urgent publication deadlines in the media.

I wish to mention that after the article was published, I was subjected to great criticism and ridicule from scientists, climate change deniers and the general public for things which I did not say. I wish to reiterate that it is very important that people be quoted accurately to avoid such misunderstandings, and that in this case, I hope that I will be afforded the opportunity and forum (Washington Post) for the record to be corrected on my statements.

I hope that we both can agree that reporting facts as accurately as possible is very important for all forms of media, including the Washington Post?

I will now itemize my issues with the article in detail in the following:

Regarding the article title: “Claim that jet stream crossing equator is ‘climate emergency’ is utter nonsense”

This title is extremely misleading, and does not represent my position at all. I did not say that the action of the jet stream crossing the equator was in itself a ‘climate emergency’, as you state in the title and throughout the article.

What I did actually say is the following, which is in the actual description of my video:

“The jet stream in the Northern Hemisphere has crossed the equator and joined up with the jet stream in the Southern Hemisphere. This seems like new behavior, and indicates that climate system mayhem is ongoing. Our climate system behavior continues to surprise us in new and scary ways that we have never anticipated, or even seen before. Welcome to climate chaos. We must declare a global climate emergency…“.

This statement is reiterated and elaborated upon throughout the video.

Additional key points on the Washington Post article are listed here:

1. The use of the word “Unprecedented.” versus “Unprecedented?”. In my original website post on Wednesday June 29th at 1:46 am EST, and in my YouTube video I used the title “Unprecedented, Jet Stream Crosses the Equator”. I quickly realized that one should really “Never say never” and “Never say always”. Thus, I corrected this erroneous title on my website post later that same day, on Wednesday June 29th at 1:36 pm; and also shortly after that on my YouTube video to “Jet Stream Crosses the Equator, Unprecedented?”. When the Washington Post article came out the next day at 12:43 pm on Thursday June 30th, almost a full day after my title correction, it unfortunately remarked on my original title, and not on my corrected title. I intended to be asking a question, namely, was the movement of the jet stream perpendicular to the equator a new behavior? I was not intending on claiming that it was new, but was asking the question since it seemed to me to be very unusual. Equatorial monsoon winds crossing the equator at relatively low wind speeds are known to occur, but they usually involve wind directions only a few degrees from the equator axis, and not at a 90 degree angle (perpendicular). The behavior that I described in the video seemed very different to me, than that of monsoonal winds.

2. The claim that the jet stream crossing the equator is a ‘climate emergency’ was something I simply never said or intended. Others imputed this to me. What I did say is that we need to declare a global ‘climate emergency’, and that the strange jet stream behavior is yet another piece of the puzzle that indicates to me that climate system mayhem is ongoing. What I have been repeatedly saying for many months, years even, is that we must declare a global ‘climate emergency’. For example, I give some examples below on what I have been saying for a long time:“

  • Chat on our ABRUPT Climate Change EMERGENCY” uploaded to YouTube on March 26, 2016:

“Humanity is NOW, TODAY in an abrupt climate change EMERGENCY. This is what science tells us. When the public, policy makers and politicians around the planet recognize this reality, the mood will flip from indifference and ignorance to utter TERROR. Just watch.

You disagree? Google “climate change” and “faster than expected”, “unprecedented”, etc. and you get gazillions of science articles. Google “climate change” and “slower than expected”, etc. and you get squat.”

  • “Fort Mac Alberta Lucks Out In Climate Casino” uploaded to YouTube on May 4, 2016:

“Yet another city gets destroyed in our global climate change casino. A few weeks ago it was Houston drowning. This week it is Fort McMurray, Alberta being destroyed. Next week it could be your city or mine…In my previous video titled “Fort McMurray’s 80,000 Climate Refugees” I explained why we are in a global climate change emergency. Here I elaborate…”

  • “Consequences of Catastrophic Climate Change” uploaded to YouTube on Mar 14, 2016:

“Never before in human history have we faced such a global-reaching upheaval like that underway today from early stages of abrupt climate system change. Will humanity continue its haphazard and disconcerted feeble attempts to address the gut-wrenching disruption and pretend that everything will work out fine as we spiral into civilization collapse? Or will we finally do what is required and treat the system turmoil as a global emergency far larger than we have ever faced before, and throw all our resources into surviving it?”

  • “Brutal Heatwave Hits 122 F in India” uploaded to YouTube on May 20, 2016

“Our emissions have changed the chemistry of the atmosphere and oceans. Global temperatures are spiking ever faster upwards. We have a global emergency.”

3.  My view on the enormous risk that humanity faces from abrupt climate change, necessitating the declaration of a global ‘climate emergency’ is based on over 7 years of intensive work on the overall climate system and the evidence that we are seeing today, and also on the evidence on behavior in the past from the paleo-records. Some examples of almost unbelievable degradation on our planet today include (and I can provide peer reviewed scientific evidence on each of these things):

  • Ocean acidity has increased >30% in the last few decades
  • Oxygen levels in ocean are declining 6x faster than oceanographers expected (Royal Society has a meeting planned on this very topic in the fall)
  • Global ocean circulation patterns are being disrupted; for example there has been a persistent pool of anomalously cold water south of Greenland that is disrupting flow of the Gulf Stream, and there has been a very warm and persistent pool of water in the northern Pacific Ocean off the west coast of North America
  • CO2 levels in June/2016 are higher than those in June/2015 by about 4 ppm; a startling ramping up of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations
  • Methane is over 1850 ppb and rapidly climbing, especially in the Arctic; emissions from the Eastern Siberian Arctic Shelf, Siberian craters, and permafrost ringing the Arctic are increasing
  • Global temperatures continue to spike up, and exceeded the Paris 1.5 degrees Celsius target for an entire month earlier this year
  • Global biodiversity has declined by 50%
  • We are experiencing massive global coral reef bleaching and dying events, along with kelp and sea grass bed destruction, as well as global ocean phytoplankton decline threatening the entire marine food chain
  • We are experiencing massive boreal forest dieback, and Amazon rainforest dieback, greatly reducing our global sinks for carbon dioxide
  • About 25% of the fish in the ocean spend part of their life cycle on coral reefs, so what will happen to them as the reefs around the world die?
  • Massive fires are ongoing in the Amazon, boreal forests and other northern regions simultaneously reducing our carbon sinks and raising our atmospheric carbon levels
  • Arctic albedo is rapidly declining due to rapidly decreasing Arctic sea ice and spring snow cover, leading to extremely rapid Arctic warming (Arctic temperature amplification)
  • The risk of losing all Arctic sea ice (Blue Ocean Event) on or before 2020 is extremely high
  • Northern hemisphere jet streams are slowing zonally and becoming much wavier leading to increases in the frequency, severity, and duration and in the geographical location of extreme weather events, changing the statistics of weather
  • Melt rates from Greenland and Antarctica ice caps are increasing exponentially, with a doubling period under a decade; this is leading to exponentially increasing sea level rise
  • The globe will experience food shortages soon as simultaneous crop failures occur from extreme weather events including droughts and torrential rains causing floods destroy crops
  • And the list goes on and on and on; jet streams crossing the equator is only one more piece of the overwhelmingly dire and coherent puzzle; I am just joining the big-picture dots on the present day climate system observations.

4. The image chosen for the article shows some weak cross-equatorial flow, and does not even show the image that I used in the video showing flow normal to the equator, connecting the two hemisphere jet streams. This image in the article is thus very misleading, and poorly chosen for the article. Figure 1 shows an image of the jet streams crossing the equator from my original viral video. On the left we see flow crossing perpendicular to the equator, while on the right we see flow crossing the equator at a shallow angle, more indicative of monsoonal flow. This distinction was completely ignored in the Washington Post article.

Figure 1: Image of jet streams crossing equator in my original viral video. Data is from June 28, 2016 at 20:00 Local time. The Washington Post article did not post this, but posted an image of a basic monsoonal flow.


Click on a location to get the wind speed; highest is the white/purple and red.


I provide many much better images of jet streams crossing the equator (Figures 2 to 7, shown subsequently), that are discussed also in three videos that I have recently posted:

1) “More Evidence on Equatorial Crossing Jet Streams”  posted on July 7, 2016

2) “More Mangled Jet Stream Behavior”  posted on July 12, 2016

3) “Loopy Jet Stream in Arctic”.  posted on July 12, 2016

Figure 2: A much better example of broken, fractured jet streams exhibiting strong coupling between the jet streams in the northern and southern hemispheres. Data is from February 4, 2014 at 22:00 Local time. Clearly seen is a strong ridge formed in the Arctic near the Bering Strait; also very unusual and strange jet stream behaviour. Link: 


Figure 3: This image is taken 24 hours later than that shown in Figure 2; the data is from February 5, 2014 at 22:00 Local time. The strong ridge that was forming in the Arctic has been pinched off on the return branch, and now feeds into itself as a loop. Link:  


Figure 4: This image is taken 24 hours later than that shown in Figure 3, namely at February 6, 2014 at 22:00 Local time. The loop in the jet stream in the Arctic near the Bering Strait has been completely pinched off from the main flow, and persisted over many days subsequently. Link: 


Figure 5: This image, showing the jet streams on February 29, 2016 at 22:00 Local time shows extremely fractured and distorted jet streams, with large cross equatorial coupling.  A northern hemisphere trough connected to flow that is joining with a strong southern hemisphere trough (note that a trough in the southern hemisphere looks like a ridge from the northern hemisphere perspective). Link:


Figure 6: This image, showing the jet streams on February 22, 2016 at 22:00 Local time also shows extremely fractured and distorted jet streams, with large cross equatorial coupling.  A northern hemisphere trough connects to flow that is joining with a strong southern hemisphere trough (note that a trough in the southern hemisphere looks like a ridge from the northern hemisphere perspective). In addition, the southern hemisphere trough brings flow to the northern hemisphere trough, completing the four-way linkage. On the same image we can see flow crossing almost parallel to the equator, more commonly associated with monsoonal flow, but certainly not monsoonal flow in the mid-Pacific Ocean. Link:


Figure 7:  This image, showing the jet streams on December 15, 2013 at 01:00 Local time shows strong jet stream flow from the northern hemisphere crossing the equator joining with a southern hemisphere jet stream.  Link:


5. In this article I was referred to twice as a “blogger”, and also as a “non-expert”, a “non-specialist” and as “working on a PhD with “a focus on abrupt climate system change” at the University of Ottawa.”  I am glad that the latter is mentioned, although I wish to add the title of Part-time Professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Ottawa; a title that I have from the University since I have taught 6 courses there, including climatology/meteorology, oceanography, and Environmental Issues; to 2nd and 3rd year undergraduates. I am also an Engineer (B.Eng. in Engineering Physics) and a Physicist (M.Sc. in Laser Optics). I am not merely some “blogger”, which anybody can see with a few minutes of basic internet searching.

6.  As I pointed out above, I made no such claim on “global climate emergency” based ONLY on the jet stream crossing the equator. This is a complete misrepresentation of my position and work. ** The article comment: These “shrill claims have no validity” are invalid since I did not make these claims, and is yet another complete misrepresentation of my position.

7.  According to the article, these claims are “unsupported and unscientific, and they demonstrate the danger of wild assertions made by non-experts reaching and misleading the masses.” This statement needs to be retracted by the Washington Post. First, the claim was not made by me. Second, what I did claim is supported by observations, by data. The jet streams do cross the equator and it does not look like monsoonal flow. Thirdly, I am certainly far from a “non-expert”, and I am certainly not “misleading” anybody. I take very strong exception to these incorrect statements, and request a public correction and apology.

8. The only place that I used the term “Unprecedented?” (and “Unprecedented” without the question mark in my original version, as already discussed in Section 1) was in the title; it appeared nowhere in my video. The word was intended as a question, with a question mark and it was quickly determined by viewers, me and others that cross-equatorial flow does happen for monsoonal flow. Thus, the answer to the question is obviously NO. As I clearly stated above, my description of “climate system mayhem”, and “Our climate system behavior continues to behave in new and scary ways that we have never anticipated, or seen before…We must declare a global climate emergency.” is based on numerous factors, of which the jet stream behavior near the equator is only one very small piece of the puzzle. Thus, another serious misrepresentation of my position.

9.  Regarding the “atmospheric scientists” who are “trusted sources in the profession”; first of all they were asked to comment on the “Unprecedented” misquote rather than the “Unprecedented?”; the question mark I used is clearly essential to describe my position.

The first two people quoted are not climate scientists who see the big-picture on climate system change as I discussed in these two videos with humorous titles:

Ask Paul. He Knows Everything About Climate. Part 1” and “Ask Paul. He Knows Everything About Climate. Part 2” .

The above two videos were both uploaded to YouTube on July 4, 2016. They are specialists in meteorology, a field in which over half of the specialists have been very strong climate deniers until recently.

    • I quote Ryan Maue (verbatim; from Marc Morano’s site) as calling “warmist physics Prof. Michio Kaku of NY City College ‘a festering wound on the field of meteorology’ for Kaku’s blaming of ‘excess heat’ on record cold and snow”; Maue also said “Kaku has no effing clue what he is talking about – ‘unstable jet streams” – huh”. Maue has clearly discounted all the research by Jennifer Francis and other scientists that are showing the jet streams are anything but stable; clearly indicating that he is hardly a “trusted source in the profession” of climate change.
    • In my view, even worse than that was Roy Spencer being asked for his opinion in the Washington Post article. Sorry to say, but all one need do is Google “Skeptical Science Roy Spencer” and they will find an enormous amount of history on climate denial rhetoric and debunking.  Perhaps quoting him at all is an egregious error by the Post, and is basically shooting the whole article in the foot, as is noted in many of the comments to the article?
    • On the other hand, the work and credibility of Jennifer Francis is very widely respected. When I met her at an extreme weather events conference in Ottawa a few years ago, I  told her in all seriousness that I thought that she should get the Nobel Prize for her work on the jet stream waviness due to Arctic temperature amplification. As she clearly pointed out to me in a recent email, she studies the Polar Jet Stream and not the Subtropical Jet Stream. Thus, her comment in the article was not that definitive. I am amazed at her view that she studies only the Polar Jet Streams and not the Subtropical Jet Streams, given that the 3 hour updates of images on the daily behavior of the jet streams shows an extremely mangled mishmash, fractured and broken behavior barely resembling the ideal of two jets per hemisphere, which shows up in longer term averaging. Disagreement is part and parcel of science. We can agree to disagree.
    • No one has yet to venture an opinion to me, as to what the jet streams will look like when or if the Arctic snow and ice are completely gone year round. Science is all about asking questions like this. Of course, I have my own views on this and I pose this question to the “atmospheric scientists” and “meteorologists” at large. I certainly would expect a strong northern to southern hemisphere coupled jet stream pattern – if there are any northern jet streams at all. I do not know all the answers, but I certainly want to ask all the questions. Ocean circulation patterns clearly connect from pole to pole.

10.  Once again, the article used language like “specious claims of Scribbler and Beckwith”, which is completely unwarranted since I made no such claims. Once again, language like “lens of a non-specialist” hardly applies to myself, and is bordering on slanderous. Also mentioned in the article is that such information “damages the reputation of the science”. Amazing statements by the Washington Post which quotes climate deniers.

11.  The last paragraph of the article states Examples like this demonstrate the pitfalls of extraordinary claims posted on blogs and the importance of consuming science that has been vetted and peer-reviewed.”

Of course vetted and peer-reviewed science is vital for advancing knowledge. Of equal importance — and I would argue is almost completely ignored — is the vital ability of people like myself to read and understand the peer reviewed science from specialists and put together a coherent picture of how all the parts come together, and what that will mean for our near term and longer term future on Earth.

Clearly, almost no one in our society is connecting the dots on all the pieces, who has a loud enough voice and impact in educating the public, policy makers and global leaders on what it all means, in terms of the absolutely enormous risks to society. Obviously, the existing system of knowledge transfer from science to mainstream media to political decision makers and world leaders is completely dysfunctional and broken as far as addressing the grave threats that humanity faces from climate change. This is obviously a separate topic of discussion. We all need to fix this, and immediately. I am trying, with great passion to fill this gap in education.

In closing, the evidence from the Earth System is screaming at the top of its lungs at us. We have a climate system emergency, as our climate system is changing abruptly, in a nonlinear fashion. As the frequency, severity and duration of extreme weather events like floods and droughts affects the provision of basic foods, we can expect increased global hunger, conflict and migration in our societies.

“What happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. It is not like Las Vegas.” — Paul Beckwith, 2010


Paul Beckwith
Part-time Professor

Department of Geography
University of Ottawa
Member of AMEG (Arctic Methane Emergency Group)


About paulbeckwith

Well known climate science educator; Part-time Geography professor (climatology, oceanography, environmental issues), University of Ottawa. Physicist. Engineer. Master's Degree in Science in Laser Optics, Bachelors of Engineering, in Engineering Physics. Won Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario gold medal. Also interested in investment and start-ups in climate solutions, renewable energy and energy efficiency. Avid chess player, and likes restoring old homes. Married with children.
This entry was posted in a Climate, a Climate Change, a New Video, a Science, a Weather, Rebuttals and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Paul’s Response to Washington Post, Jetstream Article

  1. DefiantSun says:

    You are so awesome in your approach and still open to looking at future tech solutions to Climate Change. Thank you for breaking down barriers to understanding climate change and making it easy for the lay-interested people like me that like science; but am certainly no-meteorologist.

    Rock-On Paul –i follow and repost your work heavily! ~Johnny Spicer ABQ, NM

    On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Paul Beckwith, Climate System Scientist wrote:

    > paulbeckwith posted: ” To: Jason Samenow; Washington Post Date: Wednesday > July 20, 2016 Regarding: The June 30th Washington Post article titled > “Claim that jet stream crossing equator is ‘climate emergency’ is utter > nonsense” Dear Jason, Since both my YouTube v” >

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Brian Giles says:

    Paul you are an international treasure. Thank you and keep up the good work.
    Brian Giles

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Donna Reeves says:

    Wow…Awesome Work Paul Beckwith!

    We Need More Scientists to Speak Loudly and Understand Our Dire Situation, and What is coming in the Future! Paul Beckwith is One of only a handful of scientists taking advantage of social media to reach the public. We need to know what is happening, no one else is! As a whole…Society Must understand we are in a serious situation…everyone needs to do their part to combat what is in store for humanity.

    Paul Beckwith is doing his part…but utter nonsense articles just kill what Paul is trying to do…it puts doubt in peoples mind.
    He is not paid for the many hours of research he does…It is a desperate attempt to get the truth out to the public so they can prepare.

    People need to visit his website for all the latest information. While you’re there…keep in mind that paul is working only part time so he can concentrate on the work he is doing for you/everyone! Please Donate if You Can…
    Paul puts out the plain, hard facts…no sugar coating here!

    Thanks Paul…Wonderful Work!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Christian A. Wittke says:

    Thank you Paul! I am not a classified scientist nor a regular blogger – but I do understand your explanations and I am able to put same into the conglomerate of my experience and knowledge; thank you. All the best.


  5. John Nissen says:

    Thank you, Paul, for your great efforts in alerting the world to the emergency situation facing us all.

    The article by Jason Samenow in the Washington Post suggested that the idea of a climate emergency was ridiculous. But the Earth System is behaving in ways that suggest it is moving rapidly away from the state which mankind has enjoyed for some 8000 years and which has allowed modern civilisation to develop and prosper. This change to the Earth System is especially noticeable in the Arctic, which is heading towards a new state with little snow or sea ice in summer. This could be the biggest crisis ever faced by mankind, and yet we find denial in the Washington Post without proper examination.

    Not only is the Arctic changing, but these changes are speeding up. We can see this through changes in sea ice cover, temperature and other parameters. There are a number of facts we can obtain through our observations of non-linearity in fundamental parameters with a strong domino effect:
    1. The Arctic sea ice is rapidly retreating towards a state when there will be next to no sea ice during several months of the year.
    2. The Arctic is warming at least twice as fast as the rest of the planet, and this can easily be related to point (1) such that we can expect it warm even faster in the future relative to global warming.
    3. The jet stream has been showing increasingly weird behaviour and this can be related to point (2) such that we can expect behaviour even further from the old norm in the future.
    4. There has been a marked increase in extreme weather events over the past decade and a half, which can be related to point (3) such that we can expect the cost of such events to escalate.
    5. Civil conflict is on a marked increase due to impact of floods and droughts affecting the provision of basic foods, which can be related to point (4) such that we can expect increased hunger, conflict and migration.

    Governments seem to ignore the effect that climate change is having on provoking conflict, e.g. in the Middle East. They are assuming that extreme weather will not get worse because they are told, re point (1), that the sea ice will last for decades if not for ever. They are told this by scientists relying on deficient climate models that do not adequately reflect what is actually happening under their very eyes in the Arctic. Thus governments are unaware of the potential catastrophe of climate change from this domino effect. The scientists also play down the likely effect of rapid Arctic warming on the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet, and possibility of metres of sea level rise this century. Furthermore they play down the likely effect of rapid Arctic warming on methane emissions. This is a vicious cycle of denial, because the governments largely fund the research which produces the answers which the governments want to hear: namely that there is nothing to worry about in the near future.

    Thus governments seem unaware of what must surely be considered an emergency situation, of which the disruption of jet stream behaviour is a symptom. Like Robert Scribbler, Paul has been asking the hard questions about the situation and has come to a similar conclusion: that we are in an emergency for which emergency action is demanded. It would be irresponsible of the Washington Post not to issue a warning to the public that governments are failing to protect us all from what is likely to happen if the sea ice continues its rapid decline. Emergency action is required to halt and reverse this decline by cooling the Arctic. It is too late simply to reduce our CO2 emissions as Robert Scribbler suggests, important though this is to tackle global warming and ocean acidification.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Nemesis says:

    Sir Paul Beckwith, thumbs up for this article! I guess you know, what happened to Michael Mann, when he gave the Washington TImes an interview:

    ” 15.7.2016 – How the Right Wing Denial Machine Distorts the Climate Change Discourse –
    By Michael Mann”

    ” When the public, policy makers and politicians around the planet recognize this reality, the mood will flip from indifference and ignorance to utter TERROR.”

    Yes, Sir Beckwith, that is exactly, what will happen. First, the reality is being ignored by the sheeples and then they fall into panic and terror. It is a psychological thing of suppression and denial.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Al Hetzell says:

    Paul, This is an excellent reply to a publication that specializes in promoting conservative think tank agendas. They are not interested in facts so much as stirring controversy for their political agenda flocks to use. Deniers will get their due as the Climate deteriorates further. I have been following your work for many years and want to thank you for what you are doing. The Worlds Political systems are entrenched with the Corporate greed which are pushing the denier agendas and refusing to recognize the on coming disaster our Planet is facing. It is up to all of us who have some understanding to keep up the pressure and to continue educating those who will listen of what we know and the direction we are headed if action is not taken or taken to late. Thanks again and keep up your good work.

    Al Hetzell – Biology/Geology – former college professor

    Liked by 1 person

  8. John Corbit says:

    Bravo, Paul! Truth will prevail (?).

    Sent from my iPhone


    Liked by 1 person

  9. Nemesis says:

    Uh, they got some real intense flight traffic over there 😎 Click on the link and just wait for some seconds, then a video will jump in:

    I mean, what do you think, when you see that? I mean, I don’t know, maybe I just can’t trust my old, sore eyes anymore^^ I feel like I am in a movie or something, when I watch that vid. Regular? Common sense? Ok, let’s move on 😎 …


  10. Nemesis says:

    @Paul Beckwith

    You talked about climate emergency- here you get some tailwind from the democrats:

    ” 20.7.2016 – Finding the courage to face the climate emergency: Democratic Party platform recognises crisis

    Last weekend in Orlando the platform committee of the Democratic Party added language into their platform acknowledging the official position of the Democratic Party to be that we are in a global climate emergency.

    Further, the platform acknowledges the scale of the threat to be so large that it will require a leadership response from our country on the scale of our national mobilization to confront the threat of fascism during WWII. The platform language I offered through an amendment entitled, “Global Climate Leadership”, explicitly acknowledges that anything short of that will bring catastrophic consequences to civilization:

    Democrats believe it would be a grave mistake for the United States to wait for another nation to lead the world in combating the global climate emergency. In fact, we must move first in launching a green industrial revolution, because that is the key to getting others to follow; and because it is in our own national interest to do so. Just as America’s greatest generation led the effort to defeat the Axis Powers during World War II, so must our generation now lead a World War II-type national mobilization to save civilization from catastrophic consequences…

    This article is some kind of war rethorics. But, IMO, in a democratic society, the term “leadership” is outdated. What do these democrats think? That CLIMATE CHANGE IS FASCISM or what?:

    “… it will require a leadership response from our country on the scale of our national mobilization to confront the threat of fascism during WWII.”

    Com on. Mother Nature is no fascist, climate change is no fascist and the US is surely not Uncle Sam Superman, who will save the world. Why not ask the other few countries on the globe about that “leadership”? 🙂

    We will need VOLUNTARY, peaceful global commitment for climate mitigaton (anything else will end in a political and climate mitigation desaster), not some fight against Mother Nature and climate change as some “fascist”.


    • Nemesis says:

      Gnahaha, the americanos… when I read that article above about global “leadership” of the US, this funny “hero” comes to my mind:

      These type of guys are outdated. We can survive together voluntarily and peacefully, but never against each other. I MEAN, JUST LIKE SOME RESPECTED ADULTS, you see. Maybe we don’t survive as a species anyway. Some say that. I don’t know. But I know, that we can diminish global suffering as much as possible at any time. We are ONE species on ONE globe, fighting for survival, not against each other, not against Mother Nature, not against ourselves, IMO.


      • Nemesis says:


        ” But I know, that we can dimish global suffering as much as possible at any time.”

        Should be:

        ” But I know, that we can DIMINISH global suffering as much as possible at any time.”

        Cheers to all these “leaders” out there on the other side of the ocean !

        ” It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.”

        – Gautama Buddha

        [dk, took care of it for you Memeis, at 9:14 am Fri]


      • Nemesis says:

        And the beat goes on:

        ” 26.7.2016 – Fossil Fuel Industry Continues Wrath on Renowned Climate Scientist Michael Mann – EcoWatch”

        Who is to blame? It’s written on every wall.


      • Nemesis says:

        Listen to this truly moving and powerful speech of Okyehene (Ghana) about democracy, the freedom of speech and holding leaders accountable:


      • Nemesis says:

        Interesting message from Exxon Mobil’s internal papers, back in 6.7.1978:

        ” Man has a window of five to ten years before the need for hard decisions regarding changes in energy strategies might become critical.”

        … ooops…

        One thing for sure:

        If Exxon Mobil REALLY knew about these “five to ten years” back in 1978, then we (and the future generations!) are somewhat f**** now in 2016, because 1978 is 38 years ago, not five to ten years.


  11. Nemesis says:

    Dedicated to all losers, troublemakers and shaggy strays like me, hahaha, we’ll all meet underground anyway some day, rich and poor…


  12. Dale Lanan says:

    The planet is in transition out of the habitable zone at time of Intelligence Extinction’s arrival.
    Thermodynamic Showdown with perfect storm of monetary power to externalize @ sovereignty.
    The Test of ‘Trump-Mate NOT lays in snapping out of our funk and putting a limit Real to enterprise so the work we do naturally tends to help restore Earth’s Open Systems of Nature in a tribute of respect for all the life, all the work of all the life that came before and all that still could be ; is really not measured in press results forcing entropy rise and self doubt but viewed in heavens’
    Therefore it is my contention that if we can put best effort into actually testing quantum change Y of path forward Open System in harmony with life force of Earth Biosphere relative to HZ Home of (guessing) garden flying space in a space that is not empty, that snap of awareness ta could really shine fun..
    Maybe there is a place for fun in thermodynamic law of entropy rise not allowing accidents to see.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s