Well known climate science educator; Part-time Geography professor (climatology, oceanography, environmental issues), University of Ottawa. Physicist. Engineer. Master's Degree in Science in Laser Optics, Bachelors of Engineering, in Engineering Physics. Won Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario gold medal. Also interested in investment and start-ups in climate solutions, renewable energy and energy efficiency. Avid chess player, and likes restoring old homes. Married with children.
Most media outlets and governments are in denial, so it’s no wonder much of the public doesn’t understand the urgency. Even a site like carbon brief is currently wittering on about CO2 budgets.
I left a comment there, but failed to mention my crushing disappointment that even website specializing in climate change coverage are making so many elementary mistakes.
Carbon Brief has closed comments on that article, as well as hidden existing comments (there were two other comments in addition to mine).
Basically, this is what I had to say:
Current CO2 levels are based on CO2 emitted four decades ago; what we emit now won’t show up in the readings until the 2050s.
We’re already close to 1.5C. Granted, El Nino is partly responsible, but some of the events set in motion (such as the Alberta wildfire) will probably unleash methane, which is 28 more potent as a heat-trapping gas than CO2.
Last but not least, NASA, NOAA, et al are issuing global temperatures based on mid-20th-century averages when the 1.5C and 2C thresholds are based on pre-industrial times. There needs to be pressure on these organizations to start using pre-industrial averages as a baseline, so that we’re comparing apples to apples.
Paul, thanks again for your continued efforts. Keep fighting the good fight, or it’ll all be over for us within a decade or two.
Jet Stream Shift 17 degrees Southward to Greenland
Summary
Well known and respected creator of entertaining and comprehensible videos of sometimes daunting subjects, especially in climate system science, meteorology, oceanography and Earth Sciences at YouTube.
Frequently called upon for commentary by fellow educators, activists, and public. Physicist, Engineer, and part-time professor at the University of Ottawa. His primary interest is joining-the-dots on Abrupt Climate System Change to determine where we are heading, and how fast, and what it all means for us and our amazing planet.
Most media outlets and governments are in denial, so it’s no wonder much of the public doesn’t understand the urgency. Even a site like carbon brief is currently wittering on about CO2 budgets.
http://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-only-five-years-left-before-one-point-five-c-budget-is-blown
I left a comment there, but failed to mention my crushing disappointment that even website specializing in climate change coverage are making so many elementary mistakes.
LikeLike
Carbon Brief has closed comments on that article, as well as hidden existing comments (there were two other comments in addition to mine).
Basically, this is what I had to say:
Current CO2 levels are based on CO2 emitted four decades ago; what we emit now won’t show up in the readings until the 2050s.
We’re already close to 1.5C. Granted, El Nino is partly responsible, but some of the events set in motion (such as the Alberta wildfire) will probably unleash methane, which is 28 more potent as a heat-trapping gas than CO2.
Last but not least, NASA, NOAA, et al are issuing global temperatures based on mid-20th-century averages when the 1.5C and 2C thresholds are based on pre-industrial times. There needs to be pressure on these organizations to start using pre-industrial averages as a baseline, so that we’re comparing apples to apples.
Paul, thanks again for your continued efforts. Keep fighting the good fight, or it’ll all be over for us within a decade or two.
LikeLike
http://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-only-five-years-left-before-one-point-five-c-budget-is-blown
Comments have reappeared. Whew. It would’ve been so disheartening to discover they censored legitimate responses to their articles.
LikeLike